奇迹歌词网

[00:10.53]Real Books Quicker to Read than E-books [00:14.60]传统书籍的阅读速度胜过电子 [00:14.60]People can read traditional printed books a good bit faster [00:18.70]根据一项最新研究，看传统纸质书的速度比 [00:18.70]than e-books on tablet computers, a new study has found. [00:23.71]在平板电脑上看电子书的速度要快 [00:23.71]The study tested peoples’ pace of reading on two populare-reader [00:28.08]研究将人们在两种热门的电子阅读器—— [00:28.08]tablets-Apple’s iPad and Amazon’s Kindle 2-as well as a [00:33.05]苹果的iPad 和亚马逊的Kindle2—上阅读的速度进行了对比，还和在 [00:33.05]standard PC monitor and a regular book. [00:36.98]普通电脑屏幕上看书的速度以及看传统纸质书的速度进行了对比。 [00:36.98]The 24 study participants read short stories by the author [00:41.40]24 名参与者应邀参加实验，实验内容是看海明威的短篇小说。 [00:41.40]Ernest Hemingway, chosen “because his work is pleasant and [00:45.32]该研究是尼尔森·诺曼咨询集团发起的， [00:45.32]engaging to read, and yet not so complicated that it would be [00:49.72]研究的负责人雅各布·尼尔森说， [00:49.72]above the heads of users,” said Jakob Nielsen, who led the [00:54.27]选择海明威的小说是因为“他的作品引人入胜， [00:54.27]study for the Nielsen Norman Group. [00:56.98]而又不晦涩难懂”。 [00:56.98]On average, it took people more than 17 minutes to read the [01:01.35]参与者平均用了超过17 分钟来看完 [01:01.35]selected tales, which Nielsen wrote is “enough to get them [01:06.06]选出的故事，17 分钟的时间在尼尔森 [01:06.06]immersed in the story” and is also “representative for many [01:09.34]看来足以让他们 [01:09.34]ther formats of interest, such as whitepapers and reports.” [01:14.37]“沉浸到故事内容当中”。 [01:14.37]To make sure people did not just skim the stories, the [01:17.93]为确保参与者不会跳读， [01:17.93]participants were given a reading comprehension tests afterward. [01:21.79]在测试结束后参与者还要完成一套阅读理解题。 [01:21.79]Overall, the study revealed that people read text 6.2 percent [01:26.99]总的来看，在iPad 上看书比看纸质书速度要慢6.2%， [01:26.99]slower on an iPad than on the printed page. With the Kindle, [01:31.65]而用Kindle2 的 [01:31.65]reading was 10.7 percent slower. [01:34.81]速度则要慢上10.7%。 [01:34.81]Nielsen noted that this difference between the e-readers was [01:38.63]不过尼尔森说，在各种电子阅读器上阅览的速度 [01:38.63]not statistically significant, however, so in the end the [01:43.31]差别并不大。最后 [01:43.31]only fair statement is that “tablets still haven’t beaten [01:46.91]唯一合理的结论就是“电子书尚未完全打败 [01:46.91]the printed book,” Nielsen wrote. [01:50.47]传统纸质书”。 [01:50.47]Study participants also rated each reading implement from one [01:55.01]参与者还被要求给每种阅读工具打分——范围为1 分 [01:55.01]to seven-with seven being the highest-and provided feedback [01:59.32]到7 分——并给出反馈意见。 [01:59.32]as well. [02:01.43]iPad 上使用的iBook 程序得分最高， [02:01.43]The default iBook app on the iPad used for the test took top [02:05.46]不过也只得到了5.8 分。Kindle2 [02:05.46]prize, but just barely, scoring a 5.8. Amazon’s Kindle, the [02:10.56]排在第二，得分为5.7 分， [02:10.56]close runner-up, ranked 5.7 and the regular book came in third [02:16.47]传统纸质书排在了第三， [02:16.47]by a hair at 5.6. [02:18.26]得分为5.6 分。